Academia.edu <email@example.com>: Dear Valery, Academia has invited you to join the discussion of Marek-Lars Kruusen's paper “The mass of a proton, a neutron, and an electron. Fundamental constants of the universe”. You have been invited either because you are following Marek-Lars Kruusen or because Academia thinks you'd be interested based on the overlap between this paper and what you read and write on Academia: The “standard model for elementary particle physics” seeks to describe the characteristics of all the elementary particles that exist in the Universe. There are actually a lot more different particles than can be seen in a common substance. Most of the time, these particles are unsustainable. But here we describe mainly the mass of proton, neutrons, electrons, quarks and their intermittents - gluon and photon. These particles are mostly permanent in nature and also the most common elements in the universe. It can therefore be said that it is a “mini standard model”, or a “smaller version” of the standard elementary particle physics model, which describes only the most common and permanent particles in the whole universe. The main building blocks of the entire universe matter are protons, neutrons, and electrons, since the atoms and molecules formed from them form the basis of any universe matter structure. It can also be said that the “mini-standard model”, in turn, forms the basis for this “large-standard model”, or “standard model for elementary particle physics”.
Thank you for your letter. You must be bored without me? I will amuse the backward scientific world.
The universe is built on principles, not constants of anything. All positive matter and negative matter of the Universe is built on magnetic interactions of absolutely everything. There are no structureless particles in nature, such as electrons and consequently protons and neutrons allegedly in atoms in the form of nuclei with electrons.
Why don’t they exist? Because we cannot describe and mentally imagine them. Are they solid, liquid or gaseous? These states are determined by structure, and particles don’t have it. Try to mentally compose the nucleus of an atom out of something you don’t know, and then extract energy from it. The problem of the modern scientific world is that they have no production practice, but only paperwork.
Designer in the factory can not combine unknown and incomprehensible to him materials in the product, while scientists do such tricks without thinking. There are many contradictions in the atom, but because of the worship of scientific idols and the absence of another model in the official science (OS) all humanity is still zombified by atomic nonsense. In the new fundamental neutron science (NS), chemical elements have a form of 6 8 – finite hedgehogs consisting of structural units (SU), which have 4 or 5 neutrons in their structure according to NS.
Each CE is a primary magnet, primary shock motor, primary light, primary antimatter, and primary energy. The OS has no general definition of what energy is. According to NS, energy is light of all kinds with an engine, aka antimatter with the south magnetic poles in front of it.
Positive matter is everything that consists of chemical elements, which are conditional northern monopoles with the northern poles at the ends of the needles and the southern pole in the center. The needles of the chemical elements are light and antimatter at the same time. Finally OS found out that light is antimatter, which they have been looking for over 100 years, and by destroying the chemical element we get light and energy. Light with the south pole at high speed collides with the north poles of the chemical elements and destroys them releasing needles of light which become reflected light, with positive matter losing the chemical elements, for example wallpaper burns out as well as paintings and everything else.
Summary-at the end of the day, we live in the Universe-Energy!
What is an electron and where does it come from?
All positive matter has free needles on its surface. When gas molecules stream around the surfaces of solids, they overcome the repulsion of the north poles of their needles and carry out magnetic ionic chemical bonding and accumulate on them-it is an electric charge!
As the mass of the needles grows under the influence of the gas flow, the chemical element folds up and, under the action of its engines, breaks out of the crystal lattice of the body, turning due to the magnetic chemical bonds in its structure into a graviton consisting of an electric charge and a gamma pack of 5 needles of the basic chemical element. It looks like a rocket.
Gravitons are the only fast-moving positive matter with a north pole in front, which automatically moves to the electrons of the electromagnetic magma of the planets, connecting in short chains to create gravitational flow.Chains of gravitons are magnetic lines of force (MLF).
The scientific world is arguing about whether there is ether in nature or not. It is argued that the ether must be associated with magnetism, gravitation, and the transfer of electric charges. A gravitational flow of pieces of magnetic power lines meets these requirements -Aether exists!
How do electrons appear? They appear in conductors with circular MLF, which are pushed into the conductor breaking at the junction between the electric charge and the gamma packet and moving in one direction in the magnetic tube (electrically conductive magma). The speed of the gamma pack is 5 times the speed of the electric charge and it quickly docks its five south poles to the north poles of the charge, creating a complete electron with the south pole at the front.
Thus the electron is a heavy complex ionic molecule in the form of a rocket consisting of dozens of chemical elements! Since gravitons appear on solid surfaces of different materials, they carry different electric charges and we get dozens of different electrons-this is to the question of constants!
Wanted to talk about mass, but saw a big drag on the letter and decided to postpone.