Dear Academy!
Regarding photonic and electronic structures, I would like to ask researchers a thought that seems to be understandable to them: “What are the structures of a photon and an electron?” On the first question, their terms fall apart, since these are meaningless sets of words even according to official science, which claims that these elementary particles have no structures and, in general, elementary particles are in principle structureless. Otherwise, in the presence of structures, these will no longer be particles, but matter with the presence of chemical bonds, which would have to be attributed to antimatter. However, here again the question arises: “How, without engines, they seem to move at the speed of light?” A possible answer would be special fields (no one knows what) and special properties of matter, also unknown to anyone. In our team, when they want to laugh heartily, they start reading a physics textbook, in which most of the terms and definitions are sets of words without physical meaning, which smoothly replace each other, as in the jokes of comedians on stage. As you can see, respected researchers are outstanding representatives of official science, as they say, flesh of flesh. From the above, an unambiguous conclusion follows that there are no photons and electrons in the proposed version of particles in nature! To make it clearer, I again quote “Letter to the Academy”:
(https://neutronscience.com.ua/letter-to-the-academy/
Sunday July 11th, 2021 admin
Letter to the Academy
Dear Academy (Academia.edu)!
In nature, there are no atoms in the form of nuclei with electrons and, accordingly, there are no protons, from which it follows that there is no subject for discussion.
Let’s mentally look at a simple electrical circuit – a DC generator, a light bulb and two wires.
Naturally, we will talk about electrical energy and here is the first surprise – world science does not know what energy is and does not have its general definition of the type: “Energy is ….”.
Further we will focus on the generation of electric current, and here also the world science does not have an exact definition: “Generation of electric current is …”.
We assume that in our electrical circuit the generator is working and the light is on in a stable mode, and we have a high potential at the output terminal of the generator, and low at the input terminal.
We start mentally moving along a chain from a high potential to a light bulb and, relying on common sense and school education, we see that direct current (particles or is it a wave?) By definition does not change and, most likely, is a transporter of something?
We know for sure that electric current is an electromagnetic system and it follows that the current transports a magnetic component.
However, Maxwell planted an unpleasant surprise for world science, stating that magnetic field lines (MFL) are virtual, that is, imaginary.
Consequently, the current caNSot transport what is not in the material plane. We reached a dead end from the standpoint of world science.
From the point of view of neutron sciences, MFLs are formed from chains of gravitons, and electrons are their transformers.
Found a material magnetic component and it is a high potential at constant current, which disappears immediately after the spiral of the light bulb.
Where did the magnetic component disappear? Turned into light? Naturally – no, since imaginary MFLs cannot become material carriers of light.
Electrons – particles also cannot become photons – again a dead end. In neutron sciences (NS), electrons are transformers of gravitons, consisting of gamma packets (particles) and alpha particles (electric charges, they are also slow electrons) in the form of rockets (https://neutronscience.com.ua/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/MASS_OF_A_BODY_%E2%80%93_WHAT_IS_IT.pdf).
Gamma and alpha particles are light and antimatter at the same time.
We look at the electrical circuit and see that it is a section with different resistances equal to zero in the wires and a huge resistance in the spiral.
For fast electrons, a spiral is like a concrete wall for racers and they break down on needles (light), alpha and gamma particles (light) and partly leave in the form of electrons (light).
Consequently, all the current turned into light, but where did the MFL disappear to? Let’s pay attention to the high temperature of the spiral and the heat from the light bulb.
World science has no definition of what temperature is, although it has several scales for measuring it. The NS temperature is the density of antimatter in the studied volume. There is no precise definition of heat either. According to NS, heat is a process of temperature change in the studied volume. Let us recall the formula for heat from thermodynamics – it is equal to mass multiplied by the heat capacity (c) and the temperature difference.
Let us imagine mass as the product of volume and density, then the heat capacity is the internal free volume in which the maximum temperature can be. The MFL rings tend to contract due to the presence of motors and when the current disappears, they are pressed into the conductor lattice, breaking the gravitons into alpha and gamma particles, which have south poles in front and are directed in one direction along the weakly magnetic conductor pipe.
The speed of a gamma particle is 5 times the speed of an alpha particle, and it instantly docks to it, creating a normal transformer electron. Thus, MFLs completely disappear, restoring the current.
The current came to the generator for the high potential magnetic component, but there is no such structure in the picture of the World of official science. Dead end!!! No, there are neutron sciences and a gravitational flow in the form of pieces of MFL, which restores the magnetic component of the high potential in the generator.
Generation of electric current is the constant maintenance of a high potential (voltage) at a given level. From the above, it clearly follows that there are no atoms in the form of nuclei with electrons in nature, and gravity is not the attraction of masses to each other, but gravitational flows of pieces of MFL of active masses, pressing positive matter to planets and stars. Thus, world science, constantly creating scientific idols, for example Maxwell and others, led itself and all of humanity into deep ignorance).
The next phrase “Magnetism unites in a wave” is a masterpiece of a representative of official science. Everyone who has ever studied remembers photographs of visualization of the magnetic field lines (MFL) of a permanent magnet, which clearly show that the lines are in contact and intersect with each other, which contradicts Maxwell’s statement about their parallelism. According to neutron sciences, intersection points are magnetic chemical bonds of the “magnetic velcro” type, from which it clearly follows that we have a magnetic body in front of us. The planets and stars have the same bodies, but electromagnetic. Let’s pay special attention to the fact that magnetic bodies are structures similar to lattices in metals and they are attached to planets and stars. Some of the magnetic bodies can be transferred to other ferromagnetic materials like a piece of steel from a permanent magnet. In our case, we are talking about magnetic bodies, but not about magnetism in general, since this property has nothing to do with the material world and cannot give birth to a wave in principle. There is no gravity based on waves in nature, since the Universe is not a ferromagnetic body. There is no medium for the propagation of waves – there are no waves themselves. I would like to note that official science is the mother of its children; it stubbornly proves that they (waves) still exist without any common sense, with common sense it has a strain. What can be a wave if there is no medium for its propagation? Usually such waves are represented by a piece of a sinusoid (?). What kind of beast is this – this piece of a sinusoid and what does it consist of if the wave is a material thing? Dozens of new questions immediately appear, although there is no answer to the first one. From which it follows that this is a filkin letter! All the writing about gravitational waves is the shaking of the air in the usual style of official science, since it cannot take the first step and give a definition – gravity with the help of waves is …?
Valery Andrus
valeriy.andrus@gmail.com